The Newsleaders
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Sartell – St. Stephen
    • St. Joseph
    • 2024 Elections
    • Police Blotter
    • Most Wanted
  • Opinion
    • Column
    • Editorial
    • Letter to the Editor
  • Community
    • Graduation 2025
    • Calendar
    • Criers
    • People
    • Public Notices
    • Sports & Activities Schedules
  • Obituaries
    • Obituary
    • Funerals/Visitations
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Submissions
  • Archives
    • Sartell-St. Stephen Archive
    • St. Joseph Archive
  • Advertise With Us
    • Print Advertising
    • Digital Advertising
    • Promotions
    • Pay My Invoice
  • Resource Guides
    • 2024 St. Joseph Annual Resource Guide
    • 2025 Sartell Spring Resource Guide
    • 2024 Sartell Fall Resource Guide
The Newsleaders
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion Letter to the Editor

Resident comments on Park Terrace issue from homeowners perspective

sproutadmin by sproutadmin
December 12, 2014
in Letter to the Editor, Opinion
0
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

JS Niedenfuer, St. Joseph

As a resident of the neighborhood in question, I’d like to make a couple of points in response to Cori Hilsgen’s recent article on the Park Terrace matter. First, I wonder if she spoke to any residents. She writes: “Many residents agree the project is needed…” but doesn’t actually quote anybody. I, for one, have profound doubts about the engineer’s assessment of the state of our infrastructure. After all, it’s in the city engineer’s financial interest to see this project undertaken.

Also, and importantly, it isn’t about residents “want[ing] the benefit to equal the assessment,” as in it’s something that would be nice to have, like a warm spring or a day off with pay. It’s our right under law. This is from a Minnesota House of Representatives brief: “The assessment amount charged to the property cannot exceed the amount by which the property benefits from the improvement, as measured by the increase in the market value of the land due to the improvement.” To assess more than the gain is “a taking of property, and violates the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Minnesota Constitution.” Put another way, when the city assesses more than the property owners gain in the value of their homes, the city is stealing from its residents.

This city has always assessed without any regard whatsoever to gain, choosing instead an arbitrary 60/40 split of the project costs. And as long as nobody griped, they were going to keep right on doing that. But two years ago, we did gripe, and to their credit, when reminded of their constitutional responsibilities, your city government took a long stride toward the light. They hired an appraisal to be conducted on Park Terrace in order to establish the likely gain. The figure arrived at was $4,000 to $5,000 per residence, regardless of front footage. But in the end that was not enough to meet a threshold in the bonding statute, and the matter was tabled. Now it’s back – with a new appraisal promised. This time by someone coming up from the Twin Cities. It’s my sincere hope the city has not been shopping for a firm that will give them a number they can use. I do wonder why they had to go so far afield when there are many fine local appraisers who could do the work.

It’s key to bear in mind special assessments are intended to pay for new improvements to neighborhoods, such as paved streets, municipal sewer and water, police and fire protection. Park Terrace already has working city services. It has water, sewer, curb and gutter. It has police and fire protection. Repairs to existing systems are not “improvements,” and trying to couch them as such is a shameful act, unworthy of this city.

Previous Post

March 14

Next Post

How can olive oil be ‘extra virgin?’

sproutadmin

sproutadmin

Next Post

How can olive oil be 'extra virgin?'

Please login to join discussion

Search

No Result
View All Result

Categories

Select Category

    Recent Posts

    • Woman found guilty in exploitation case
    • Mother-daughter duo opens fabric store
    • Sartell man sentenced for bilking, swindling
    • Dynamic innovator Doyscher-Domres retires
    • RSVP members help strengthen community

    City Links

    Sartell
    St. Joseph
    St. Stephen

    School District Links

    Sartell-St. Stephen school district
    St. Cloud school district

    Chamber Links

    Sartell Chamber
    St. Joseph Chamber

    Community

    Calendar

    Citizen Spotlight

    Criers

    People

    Notices

    Funerals/Visitions

    Obituary

    Police Blotter

    Public Notices

    Support Groups

    About Us

    Contact Us

    News Tips

    Submissions

    Advertise With Us

    Print Advertising

    Digital Advertising

    2024 Promotions

    Local Advertising Rates

    National Advertising Rates

    © 2025 Newleaders

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
      • Sartell – St. Stephen
      • St. Joseph
      • 2024 Elections
      • Police Blotter
      • Most Wanted
    • Opinion
      • Column
      • Editorial
      • Letter to the Editor
    • Community
      • Graduation 2025
      • Calendar
      • Criers
      • People
      • Public Notices
      • Sports & Activities Schedules
    • Obituaries
      • Obituary
      • Funerals/Visitations
    • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Submissions
    • Archives
      • Sartell-St. Stephen Archive
      • St. Joseph Archive
    • Advertise With Us
      • Print Advertising
      • Digital Advertising
      • Promotions
      • Pay My Invoice
    • Resource Guides
      • 2024 St. Joseph Annual Resource Guide
      • 2025 Sartell Spring Resource Guide
      • 2024 Sartell Fall Resource Guide

    © 2025 Newleaders

    Notifications